Is the World Warming?
How is it that a major scandal like that involving the climate change group can be brushed aside? I fully understand why NBC won’t report on it. Their parent company, General Electric, is fully invested in climate change as they are who stands to gain the most from it by selling wind turbines and solar panels that will not stand on their on economic merits.
That does not explain why other networks and media outlets won’t report on it. Could it be that they have so bought into the rhetoric in the past, that to admit they were wrong now would damage their credibility. Perhaps, but it is likely far more simple than that. It might simply be that the political ideology and the candidates that they support have all bought into the program and therefore to report negatively on the subject is tantamount to disagreeing with the left wing liberals who stand to gain the most or who believe the best way to gain and maintain control is to redistribute wealth using the climate change format as justification.
There appears now to be no credible evidence that the change in our climate is anything more that the natural cyclical changes that have evolved on this earth for millions of years. Since the change appears to be natural and consistent with historical changes, we must conclude that the existence of man on the planet is merely coincidental and that man has had no impact on global climate.
Americans have done more to improve the lives of the world’s people than any other civilization in history. Yes, we have benefited the most as well. People around the world want what we have and somehow think the way to get it is to make the American’s pay for it. The idea is to raise the standard of living for the rest of the world while Americans will be forced economically to lower theirs. In essence, Americans will subsidize the world economy through climate change legislation.
As the world sends their representatives to the United Nations Summit on climate change, one has to wonder how many arrived in private jets and what is the carbon footprint of the meeting itself.
That does not explain why other networks and media outlets won’t report on it. Could it be that they have so bought into the rhetoric in the past, that to admit they were wrong now would damage their credibility. Perhaps, but it is likely far more simple than that. It might simply be that the political ideology and the candidates that they support have all bought into the program and therefore to report negatively on the subject is tantamount to disagreeing with the left wing liberals who stand to gain the most or who believe the best way to gain and maintain control is to redistribute wealth using the climate change format as justification.
There appears now to be no credible evidence that the change in our climate is anything more that the natural cyclical changes that have evolved on this earth for millions of years. Since the change appears to be natural and consistent with historical changes, we must conclude that the existence of man on the planet is merely coincidental and that man has had no impact on global climate.
Americans have done more to improve the lives of the world’s people than any other civilization in history. Yes, we have benefited the most as well. People around the world want what we have and somehow think the way to get it is to make the American’s pay for it. The idea is to raise the standard of living for the rest of the world while Americans will be forced economically to lower theirs. In essence, Americans will subsidize the world economy through climate change legislation.
As the world sends their representatives to the United Nations Summit on climate change, one has to wonder how many arrived in private jets and what is the carbon footprint of the meeting itself.
posted by Laymansview | 5:35 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home